Friday 6 February 2015

Post Colonialism Blog Task

1) Summarise the three theorists we have looked at: Alvarado, Fanon and Said.
Alvarado's theory (1987) was that black people in the media are split into four categories:
  • Exotic (Models, Music Artists, Athletes and Food)
  • Dangerous (Crime, Gangs and Socially Dysfunctional)
  • Humorous (Comedians and Sidekicks)
  • Pitted (Poverty)
Frantz Fanon (1952) Claimed that black people were "Were putting on the white mask." He also said that black stereotypes can be:

  • Infantilize (Children in Poverty)
  • Primitivize (Beats, Sporting Prowess)
  • Decivilize (Gangster, Pimps)
  • Esssentialize (All look the same)

Edward Said said  there is Gulf between the east and west. Also Civilised vs Uncivilised.

2) Watch the opening of Yasmin (2004) again. Does it offer a positive or negative view of British Muslims? To what extent does it reinforce or challenge Edward Said's theory of Orientalism - that the west is superior to the exotic or uncivilised east?

I think there are both positive and negative representations of British Muslims in this film. A negative representation is firstly shown sue to the main character. She pretends she is a good Muslim woman to her family, but when she is at work, she looks like western woman. This means she is trying to conform to two different parts of society and by doing so she is conceding her morals and religion. However there is also a positive representation of British Muslims in this film as the boy, who has also conformed a little to western ways, which is shown by his Nike trainers, however has not neglected his religion and morals. This is shown when he still goes to pray when the call to pray comes out in the city. This therefore can mean that British Muslims are able to conform with western ways, and still be religious. 

3) Finally, choose THREE clips for EACH of the theorists and explain how you could apply that theory to the clip. Pick a selection of clips on YouTube from TV, film, music video or advertising and embed them in your blog before writing your analysis under each clip. Note: this means you need NINE clips in total on this blogpost.


Alvardo.





Fannon 








Said 










Wednesday 4 February 2015

Identities and the Media: Reading the Riots

How did the language and selection of images in the coverage create a particular representation of young people?
The language and selection of images, gave a negative representation of young people. They did this by using words, that evoke a reaction from the audience, or pictures that make young people look bad. An example of this is through the word “Anarchy.” This word has a connotation of lawlessness, meaning that the young people have no morals or respect for their country.
Also, the picture of the person in the tracksuit with a scarf covering his face and gloves represents young people as “Chav”. This is because wearing a hoodie or tracksuit is a shorthand that audience may use to identify a trouble maker.

Why does David Buckingham mention Owen Jones and his work Chavs: the demonisation of the working class?
I think David Buckingham mentioned Owen Jones and his book because it showed the audience who are reading media magazine that there was a lot of middle classed youth in the riots, as there was a lot of talk about the riots being attended by working classed youth instead of the middle classed youth that can hardly put a foot wrong.

What is the typical representation of young people – and teenage boys in particular? What did the 2005 IPSOS/MORI survey find?
The typical representation of young people is negative. This can be backed up by the stat 72% of stories in newspapers about youth are negative. This shows representation of youth is not a good one. Also, a typical representation of young people, especially boys could be that they are drug takers and criminals, due to the amount of stories which contain those things.
The 2005 IPSOS/MORI


How can Stanley Cohen’s work on Moral Panic be linked to the coverage of the riots?
A moral panic is an intense feeling expressed in a population about an issue that appears to threaten the social order. Moral panics are in essence controversies that involve arguments and social tension, and in which disagreement is difficult because the matter at its center is taboo. This therefore can be linked to the riots as the riots threatened social order.
What elements of the media and popular culture were blamed for the riots?
The elements blamed for the riots in regards to the media were violent video games, rap music and reality TV. 

How was social media blamed for the riots? What was interesting about the discussion of social media when compared to the Arab Spring in 2011?
Social media was blamed for advertising the riots and giving people a platform to interact and organise the riots also. In regards to Arab Springs, they used social media to show us how bad they were being treated. This shows that social media can be used for good.

The riots generated a huge amount of comment and opinion - both in mainstream and social media. How can the two-step flow theory be linked to the coverage of the riots?

Alternatively, how might media scholars like Henry Jenkins view the 'tsunami' of blogs, forums and social media comments? Do you agree that this shows the democratisation of the media?
I think that it does show democratisation as people are able to express their opinions and have freedom of speech without fear of backlash due to new and digital media’s anonymity.
What were the right-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The right wing compared them to animals that needed to be tamed, like a beast.  What were the left-wing responses to the causes of the riots?
The left wing believes that other factors are to blame such as unemployment and lack of youth clubs, and social places for youth to be. 

What are your OWN views on the main causes of the riots?
In my opinion, I think the riots were caused by the shooting of Mark Duggan initially. However, I think the latter parts were due to greed.

How can capitalism be blamed for the riots? What media theory (from our new/digital media unit) can this be linked to?

Capitalism can be blamed for the riots because everyone in those riots wanted wealth. That is what capitalism is about. 

Were people involved in the riots given a voice in the media to explain their participation?

People involved in the riots were not able to voice their opinion as it may have the things people in institutions had to say about them.

What is your own opinion on the riots? Do you have sympathy with those involved or do you believe strong prison sentences are the right approach to prevent such events happening in future?

Post-colonialism: blog task

Films

  • Kidulthood
  • Adulthood
  • Anuvahood
  • Shank
  • Attack The Block

TV

  • Luther
  • TopBoy
  • 55 Degrees North
  • Line of Duty 
  • Citizen Khan 

Online Only

  • Brothers with No Game
  • Venus vs Mars
  • The Ryan Sisters 
  • All about the Mckenzies  
  • Meet the Adebanjos 

Alvarado's theory (1987) was that black people in the media are split into four categories:
  • Exotic (Models, Music Artists, Athletes and Food)
  • Dangerous (Crime, Gangs and Socially Dysfunctional)
  • Humorous (Comedians and Sidekicks)
  • Pitted (Poverty)
Frantz Fanon (1952) Claimed that black people were "Were putting on the white mask." He also said that black stereotypes can be:

  • Infantilize (Children in Poverty)
  • Primitivize (Beats, Sporting Prowess)
  • Decivilize (Gangster, Pimps)
  • Esssentialize (All look the same)
In these short films and trailers, it is quite easy to use Alvarado and Fanon, as the subject(s) of each of the films are black and British. For instance, in "gone too far", Alvarado's theory can be used as the the music at the start of the trailer was afrobeats, which is known as a very lively music genre, tapping into the category of exotic. Also, the accent of the brother could make the audience laugh as it is not what they are use to. This therefore may tap into the humorous category as well as the exotic.
Fanon's theory may also be used as the girls could be seen as putting on the white mask as she says "I don't speak to people who don't speak english." This shows, the girl is deluded as she thinks she is any different to the guy who has just come to England. 

Index 2

1.Iphone 6 plus
2.Digital journalism
3.Impact of new media
4.Celebrity nudes
5.Premier league coverage
6.Twitter gives clues to help find murderers
7.Social media friends
8.Terrorist on social media
9.Page 3 ad banned
10.Racism on twitter
11.NDM11
12.NDM12
13.NDM13
14.NDM 14
15.NDM15
16.NDM16
17.NDM17
18.NDM18
19.NDM19
20.NDM20
21.NDM21
22.NDM22
23.NDM23
24.NDM24
25.NDM25
26.NDM26
27.NDM27
28.NDM28
29.NDM29
30.NDM30
31.NDM31
32.NDM32

Tuesday 3 February 2015

NDM 32

Social Media Messages Not an Offence: Centre to Supreme Court

Article
The government today told the Supreme Court that posting messages in social media relating to freedom of expression will not be seen as an offence. The court is hearing petitions challenging provisions of the Information Technology law that allow the police to arrest those who post "annoying, inconvenient and dangerous messages" on social media.
"The government doesn't wish to curtail freedom of speech," the Centre told the court, adding, "Exercising one's freedom of speech won't be an offence, but this law applies to cyber crimes." 

In my opinion, I think that this is a big step in India's economy if they are able to say what they want on social media as it promotes freedom of speech. Although nations promote freedom of speech, they use things people say as evidence. They also get frowned upon when certain  people say something. However, things said on social media may be used, even though the government said it wouldn't because criminals may now use social media which can lead to evidence after hearing the law being passed.